Flockler vs Tagembed: Which Social Media Aggregator is Better for Your Website

In today’s digital world, displaying user-generated content and social media feeds on your website has become essential for building trust and engagement. Brands and businesses use tools like Flockler and Tagembed to collect, curate, and embed social content directly on their websites.

But which one is better for your needs? Both platforms serve a similar purpose but differ in terms of pricing, customization, integrations, and user experience.

In this blog, we’ll compare Flockler vs Tagembed in detail, their features, pros, cons, pricing, and which one gives you the best value for your money.


Overview: What Are Flockler and Tagembed?

What is Flockler?

Flockler is a social media aggregator tool that allows users to gather content from multiple platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter (X), YouTube, and LinkedIn, and display it beautifully on their website.
It’s commonly used by brands, educational institutions, and media companies to display UGC (User Generated Content) or social proof in the form of live feeds and walls.

What is Tagembed?

Tagembed is also a social media aggregation and embedding tool that lets you collect, customize, and display content from various social networks. If you’re exploring Flockler alternatives, Tagembed stands out by offering deeper integrations, advanced customization, and flexible pricing.

It supports platforms like Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Google Reviews, Pinterest, and more, all through an easy drag-and-drop editor.

Both are designed to make your website more engaging by adding fresh, dynamic, and trustworthy content directly from social platforms.


Supported Platforms

Flockler:

Flockler supports major social platforms such as:

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter (X)
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

It’s reliable for basic social feeds, but lacks integration with certain platforms like TikTok or Google Reviews, which many businesses now prioritize for authenticity.

Tagembed:

Tagembed supports 20+ platforms, including:

  • Instagram, Facebook, Twitter (X), YouTube, and LinkedIn
  • Google Reviews, Yelp, and Airbnb for review feeds
  • TikTok, Pinterest, and Vimeo for creative content
  • Slack, RSS, and more for custom data sources

This broader range gives Tagembed a clear edge, especially for brands wanting to merge social posts, reviews, videos, and even a YouTube widget all in one place.

Verdict: Tagembed wins for its wider platform support and versatility.


Ease of Use and Setup

Both Flockler and Tagembed are beginner-friendly, but the user experience differs slightly.

Flockler:

Flockler has a clean interface, but its setup process can feel a bit lengthy for beginners. You need to connect social accounts, manually configure display layouts, and copy embed codes into your site.
It works fine for users with moderate technical knowledge but might seem overwhelming for first-timers.

Tagembed:

Tagembed makes setup much simpler. You just need to:

  1. Sign up and choose a platform (e.g., Instagram or Google Reviews).
  2. Connect your account or paste a hashtag or URL.
  3. Customize your feed’s layout and design.
  4. Copy and paste the auto-generated embed code into your website.

No coding, no complexity — just plug and play. It even offers direct integration for platforms like WordPress, Squarespace, Shopify, and Wix.

Verdict: Tagembed is faster and easier to use for beginners and businesses alike.


Customization and Design Options

Customization is key when embedding social content. You want your feeds to blend seamlessly with your website’s design.

Flockler:

Flockler provides a few basic customization options like layout style, background colors, and post arrangement. However, design flexibility is somewhat limited — especially for users who want complete control over fonts, themes, and advanced styling.

Tagembed:

Tagembed excels here with its drag-and-drop customization editor. You can:

  • Choose from multiple layouts (carousel, grid, masonry, slider).
  • Change fonts, colors, and spacing.
  • Add custom CSS for complete control.
  • Include a moderation panel to filter unwanted posts before displaying them.

It even offers real-time feed updates, so new content appears automatically without manual refreshing.

Verdict: Tagembed offers more flexibility and control over design and content moderation.


Features and Functionalities

Let’s look at what makes both tools unique.

Flockler Features:

  • Aggregates social feeds from multiple sources.
  • Displays UGC on websites, digital signage, or event screens.
  • Supports hashtags, handles, and page-based feeds.
  • Responsive and mobile-friendly layouts.

However, it lacks built-in moderation tools and advanced analytics in lower-tier plans.

Tagembed Features:

  • Aggregates content from 20+ sources.
  • Offers powerful UGC moderation tools.
  • Customizable design themes and widgets.
  • Real-time auto-syncing of new posts.
  • Analytics dashboard to measure engagement and performance.
  • Tagembed Reviews Widget to embed Google or Facebook reviews directly.
  • Integration with all major CMS platforms and website builders.

Tagembed also allows you to embed social walls in email campaigns or digital screens, giving it more use cases than Flockler.

Verdict: Tagembed takes the lead with more advanced and business-focused features.


Pricing Comparison

Flockler Pricing:

Flockler offers four pricing plans:

  • Starter: Starts around $55/month (limited sources and feeds).
  • Business: $110/month.
  • Premium: $220/month.
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing.

There’s no permanent free plan, and advanced features require upgrades.

Tagembed Pricing:

Tagembed provides more flexible and budget-friendly options:

  • Free Plan: Includes one widget and basic customization.
  • Basic Plan: Starts at around $9/month.
  • Pro Plan: Around $19/month.
  • Plus & Premium Plans: Include advanced features, analytics, and more feeds.

Even the free plan allows auto-syncing and moderate customization — perfect for small businesses or startups.

Verdict: Tagembed offers far better pricing flexibility and value for money.


Integration and Compatibility

Both tools integrate with popular website builders, but Tagembed has broader compatibility.

Flockler Integrations:

  • WordPress (via shortcode)
  • Squarespace
  • Wix
  • Shopify

Tagembed Integrations:

  • WordPress (plugin)
  • Shopify (app store integration)
  • Squarespace
  • Wix
  • Weebly
  • HTML websites
  • HubSpot, Notion, Webflow, and more

It even offers dedicated plugins and apps that make embedding feeds much easier than manually copying code snippets.

Verdict: Tagembed wins again for seamless integrations with a wider range of platforms.


Customer Support and Documentation

Flockler:

Flockler offers email support and a small help center with articles. Response times are decent but not the fastest, especially for smaller accounts.

Tagembed:

Tagembed provides 24/7 live chat and email support, along with video tutorials and detailed documentation.
Their customer support is highly responsive — a huge plus if you’re new to embedding tools.

Verdict: Tagembed provides quicker and more accessible support options.


Final Words

When it comes to selecting between Flockler and Tagembed, the right choice depends on your specific goals, budget, and website requirements. Both tools offer strong social media integration and user-friendly widgets, helping you showcase authentic user-generated content effectively.

If you need an easy-to-use, budget-friendly option with smooth performance, Tagembed might be ideal. On the other hand, if you’re looking for more enterprise-level customization and analytics, Flockler could be a solid fit.

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started